Docket
27788
Her Majesty the Queen v. Jacques Cinous
(Quebec) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
---|---|---|
2002-05-02 | Appeal closed | |
2002-04-22 | Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties | |
2002-04-22 | Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal | |
2002-04-05 | Copy of formal judgment being prepared | |
2002-03-22 | Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties | |
2002-03-21 | Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ L'HD G Ia Ma Ba Bi Arb LeB, The appeal is allowed and the accused's conviction is restored, Iacobucci, Major and Arbour JJ. dissenting. Allowed |
|
2001-04-23 | Transcript received, and distributed to the judges (71 pages) | |
2001-04-18 | Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow | |
2001-04-18 | Hearing of the appeal, 2001-04-18, (V036), CJ L'HD G Ia Ma Ba Bi Arb LeB Judgment reserved |
|
2001-04-18 | Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings | |
2001-04-17 | Notice of miscellaneous motion, (Avis d'intention de plaider oralement des arguments supplémentaires) (by fax) (sent to Bench Apr. 17/01), Completed on: 2001-04-17 | Jacques Cinous |
2001-04-17 | Book of authorities, (Supplementary), Completed on: 2001-04-30 | Attorney General for Ontario |
2001-04-11 | Book of authorities, (Vol. I & II), Completed on: 2001-04-11 | Attorney General for Ontario |
2001-04-11 | Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2001-04-11 | Attorney General for Ontario |
2001-04-11 | Book of authorities, Completed on: 2001-04-11 | Attorney General of Canada |
2001-04-11 | Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2001-04-11 | Attorney General of Canada |
2001-04-11 | Order on motion for leave to intervene, (ORAL ARGUMENT OF 15 MINUTES EACH GRANTED TO A.G. - CANADA & A.G. - ONTARIO) | |
2001-04-06 | Notice of appearance, de Me Lori-Renée Weitzman à l'audition de l'appel | Her Majesty the Queen |
2001-03-23 | Notice of appearance, de Me Christian Gauthier et Me Louis Gélinas à l'audition de l'appel | Jacques Cinous |
2001-03-20 | Respondent's book of authorities, Completed on: 2001-03-23 | Jacques Cinous |
2001-03-20 | Respondent's factum, (voir décision du 5 mars/01) (retourné pour correction - mauvaise couleur le 21 mars/01/ reçu le 22 mars/01) (signification du mémoire révisé le 19 mars/01 et reçue le 4 avr./01), Completed on: 2001-03-23 | Jacques Cinous |
2001-03-16 | Appeal hearing scheduled, 2001-04-18 Judgment reserved |
|
2001-03-05 | Decision on motion to extend time, Reg, La requête est accordée. L'intimé doit signifier et produire son mémoire, son dossier et son receuil de jurisprudence au plus tard le 21 mars 2001. Les intervenants doivent signifier et produire leur mémoire au plus tard le 11 avril 2001. Granted, no order as to costs |
|
2001-03-05 | Submission of motion to extend time, Reg | |
2001-03-05 | Correspondence received from, M. Bernstein undated (fax copy) re: his factum will be filed by April 11, 2001 and the hearing of the appeal will be on April 18, 2001 | Attorney General for Ontario |
2001-02-27 | Response to motion to extend time, (Letter Form), letter from Robert Frater dated Feb. 27/01, Completed on: 2001-02-27 | Attorney General of Canada |
2001-02-20 | Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 2001-04-17 | |
2001-02-15 | Motion to extend time, pour déposer le dossier, le mémoire et le recueil de jurisprudence de l'intimé au 21 mars 2001, Completed on: 2001-02-15 | Jacques Cinous |
2001-02-08 | Notice of change of counsel, de M. Neremberg à C. Gauthier | Jacques Cinous |
2001-02-06 | Order on motion for leave to intervene, (BY THE COURT) | |
2001-02-06 | Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Ba, by the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO. The factum is limited to 20 pages. The request to present oral argument is deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the interveners ( 15 MINUTES ORAL ARGUMENT GRANTED APR. 11/01). The interveners shall not be entitled to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties. Pursuant to rule 18(6) the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the interventions. Granted, no order as to costs |
|
2001-02-06 | Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Ba, by the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA. The factum is limited to 20 pages. The request to present oral argument is deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the interveners ( 15 MINUTES ORAL ARGUMENT GRANTED APR. 11/01). The interveners shall not be entitled to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties. Pursuant to rule 18(6) the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the interventions. Granted, no order as to costs |
|
2001-02-06 | Submission of motion for leave to intervene, by A.G. - Ont. & Can., Ba | |
2001-01-29 | Appeal court record, 2 boîtes (avec dossier de première instance) | |
2001-01-12 | Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), de Noel & Ass. en date du 12 janvier 2001 (télécopieur) re: s'en remet à la discrétion de la Cour - interventions par P.G. Ontario et Canada, Completed on: 2001-01-12 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2000-12-22 | Motion for leave to intervene, to file a factum and present oral argument (2 copies), Completed on: 2001-01-02 | Attorney General for Ontario |
2000-12-21 | Appellant's book of authorities, Completed on: 2000-12-21 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2000-12-21 | Appellant's factum, Completed on: 2000-12-21 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2000-12-21 | Appellant's record, Vol. I to III, Completed on: 2000-12-21 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2000-12-21 | Motion for leave to intervene, 2 copies, Completed on: 2000-12-21 | Attorney General of Canada |
2000-10-26 | Letter acknowledging receipt of notice of appeal | |
2000-10-23 | Notice of appeal, Completed on: 2000-10-23 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2000-10-17 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties | |
2000-10-13 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties | |
2000-10-12 | Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal is granted. Granted, no order as to costs |
|
2000-07-10 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, L'HD Ba LeB | |
2000-04-10 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 2000-04-10 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2000-04-03 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2000-04-03 | Jacques Cinous |
2000-03-22 | Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal | |
2000-03-10 | Correspondence received from, de Noel & Ass. en date du 8 mars (télécopieur) re: errata dans le titre de la demande (a. 683(1)b) au lieu de a. 693(1)b) | Her Majesty the Queen |
2000-03-10 | Correspondence received from, de Noel & Ass. en date du 8 mars (télécopieur) re: confirme qu'il n'y a pas d'ordonnance de non-publication | Her Majesty the Queen |
2000-03-06 | Application for leave to appeal, (vols. 1 and 2), Completed on: 2000-03-06 | Her Majesty the Queen |
- Date modified: