Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


29662

David Masi Cheddesingh v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2004-03-26 Appeal closed
2004-03-22 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2004-03-19 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ Ia Ma Bi LeB De F, We are all of the view that this appeal should be dismissed. (see long version)
Dismissed
2004-03-19 Appellant's condensed book, -14 copies David Masi Cheddesingh
2004-03-19 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, from all parties
2004-03-19 Hearing of the appeal, 2004-03-19, CJ Ia Ma Bi LeB De F
Judgment rendered
2004-03-02 Appeal perfected for hearing
2004-02-27 Respondent's book of authorities, Completed on: 2004-02-27 Her Majesty the Queen
2004-02-27 Respondent's record, Completed on: 2004-02-27 Her Majesty the Queen
2004-02-27 Respondent's factum, filed with Appendix (16 copies) requested 8 copies - rec'd Mar1/04, Completed on: 2004-02-27 Her Majesty the Queen
2004-01-16 Appellant's book of authorities, Completed on: 2004-01-16 David Masi Cheddesingh
2004-01-16 Appellant's factum, (see order), Completed on: 2004-01-16 David Masi Cheddesingh
2004-01-12 Appellant's record, (see order), Completed on: 2004-01-12 David Masi Cheddesingh
2004-01-08 Order on motion to adjourn the hearing of the appeal, (BY CHIEF JUSTICE)
2004-01-08 Decision on motion to adjourn the hearing of the appeal, CJ, The motion to adjourn the appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed
2004-01-08 Order on motion to extend time, (BY CHIEF JUSTICEo
2004-01-08 Decision on motion to extend time, CJ, 1) The appellant is granted an extension of time to serve and file its factum to January 16, 2004.
2) The respondent is granted an extension of time to serve and file its factum to February 27, 2004.
Allowed in part
2004-01-07 Submission of motion to adjourn the hearing of the appeal, CJ
2004-01-07 Submission of motion to extend time, CJ
2003-12-12 Motion to extend time, to serve and file the Appellant's factum to Jan. 8/04 and the Respondent's factum to March 4/04 - joint with motion to adjourn, Completed on: 2003-12-12 David Masi Cheddesingh
2003-12-12 Motion to adjourn the hearing of the appeal, (joint with motion to extend time to file both Appellant's and Respondent's factum), Completed on: 2003-12-12 David Masi Cheddesingh
2003-11-24 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2003-11-20 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2004-03-19
Judgment rendered
2003-09-25 Notice of change of counsel, (from D. Tanovich to Leslie Maunder) David Masi Cheddesingh
2003-09-25 Notice of appeal, Completed on: 2003-09-25 David Masi Cheddesingh
2003-09-18 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted)
2003-09-05 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2003-09-04 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for an extension of time is granted and the application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C33325, dated August 20, 2002, is granted.
Granted
2003-06-23 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, G Ma Arb
2003-06-23 Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, G Ma Arb
2003-05-09 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2003-04-15 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2003-04-15 Her Majesty the Queen
2003-03-17 Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2003-05-09 David Masi Cheddesingh
2003-03-17 Application for leave to appeal, (Extension of time included in leave book), Completed on: 2003-05-09 David Masi Cheddesingh

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Cheddesingh, David Masi Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Cheddesingh, David Masi

Counsel
Name
C. Leslie Maunder
Contact information
Pinkofskys
510-481 University Ave.
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2E9
Telephone: (416) 598-1811 Ext: 5256
FAX: (416) 598-3384
Email: maunder@pinkofskys.com
Agent
Name
Brian A. Crane, Q.C.
Contact information
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: brian.crane@gowlingwlg.com

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
Name
Sandra Kingston
Contact information
Attorney General of Ontario
Crown Law Office - Criminal
10th Floor - 720 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-2460
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: sandra.kingston@jus.gov.on.ca
Agent
Name
Robert E. Houston, Q.C.
Contact information
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The following facts were set out by Abella J.A. in her judgment in the Court of Appeal. On the evening of July 29, 1996, the Appellant went to the apartment of some friends where he drank and had an argument over the phone with his girlfriend. He and one of his friends had made plans to steal a compressor that night, but his friend refused to go through with the plan, leading to an argument. The Appellant then suggested to another of his friends that they purchase some marijuana. When the friend declined, he became angry and left. At 2:50 a.m., he broke into a ground floor apartment in Mississauga. The occupant confronted him, and punched him in the nose, causing it to bleed. The Appellant, who had been carrying a bottle of gasoline, threw it at the feet of the occupant, where it shattered. The Appellant then broke into an apartment at a senior citizens' residence around the corner. He ransacked the apartment, taking a number of items, while the 82-year-old male occupant remained asleep.

At approximately 3:20 a.m., in the same senior citizens' residence, he broke into the apartment of a 76-year-old widow. The Appellant sexually assaulted the victim, violently raping her and possibly sodomizing her. Throughout the prolonged assault, she attempted to stop him, but was afraid to cry out. He had told her he had a razor, that she should remain quiet, and he threatened to suffocate her. She was convinced he was going to kill her. Before finally leaving the apartment at 6:15 a.m., the Appellant stole her glasses and the contents of her wallet. As a result of the assault, the victim sustained severe lacerations to her vagina. She bled so profusely that she required a blood transfusion.

Over the month that the victim was in hospital, her condition deteriorated dramatically. She developed pneumonia and a number of other complications leading to multi-organ dysfunction. Her psychological condition deteriorated dramatically as well. The trial judge found that the decline of her mental state contributed significantly to her physical deterioration. On August 29, 1996, the victim died.

The Appellant was charged with two counts of break, enter and theft, and one count of manslaughter. He was convicted after a five-week trial. The Crown sought a life sentence and 10 years of parole ineligibility. The defence sought a sentence from 9 to 11 years. The Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment and 8 years of parole ineligibility but, on appeal, both parties conceded that the minimum ineligibility period under s. 743.6 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, was ten years. The Court of Appeal varied the parole ineligibility period to 10 years and otherwise dismissed the appeal.

Lower court rulings

May 21, 1999
Ontario Court of Justice


Appellant sentenced to life imprisonment; eight-year parole ineligibility period imposed

August 20, 2002
Court of Appeal for Ontario

C33325

Parole ineligibility period varied to ten years in accordance with s. 743.6 of the Criminal Code; appeal otherwise dismissed

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13