Docket

27118

Mary Danyluk v. Ainsworth Technologies Inc., et al.

(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

Proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2006-12-12 Payment out cheque issued, ($618.47)
2006-11-23 Approved order for payment out, (sent to Finance Nov. 23/06) - Document not microfilmed but is on file
2006-11-16 Correspondence received from, Lang Michener re: enclosing consent and order for payment out - Document not microfilmed but is on file Mary Danyluk
2001-09-19 Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal
2001-08-07 Appeal closed
2001-08-02 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2001-07-18 Copy of formal judgment being prepared
2001-07-13 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2001-07-12 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ Ia Ma Ba Bi Arb LeB, The appeal is allowed with costs throughout.
Allowed, with costs
2001-02-26 Appellant's book of authorities, (1 additional authority with consent) (sent to Bench Feb. 27/01), Completed on: 2001-02-26 Mary Danyluk
2000-11-08 Transcript received, (66 pages)
2000-10-31 Hearing of the appeal, 2000-10-31, (V074), CJ Ia Ma Ba Bi Arb LeB
Judgment reserved
2000-10-31 Supplemental document, Appellant's Book of Excerpts for oral argument given in Court Mary Danyluk
2000-10-31 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings
2000-10-26 Notice of appearance, of John E. Brooks and Rita Samson at the hearing of the appeal Ainsworth Technologies Inc.
2000-10-25 Notice of appearance, of Howard A. Levitt and J. Michael Mulroy at the hearing of the appeal Mary Danyluk
2000-09-15 Notice of hearing Mary Danyluk
2000-09-08 Correspondence received, from S. Smyth, counsel for the applicant in Imperial Oil, file no. 27744) dated Sept. 8, 2000 (fax copy) re: would like to be heard with this case if leave is granted in 27744
2000-09-01 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2000-10-31
Judgment reserved
2000-08-17 Response to motion to extend time, (Letter Form), letter from J. Michael Mulroy dated August 16/0o re: will not be responding, Completed on: 2000-08-17 Mary Danyluk
2000-08-17 Decision on motion to extend time, Reg, to serve and file the respondent's factum and book of authorities to Aug. 14, 2000.
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-08-17 Submission of motion to extend time, Reg
2000-08-11 Respondent's book of authorities, Completed on: 2000-08-11 Ainsworth Technologies Inc.
2000-08-11 Respondent's factum, Completed on: 2000-08-11 Ainsworth Technologies Inc.
2000-08-11 Motion to extend time, to file the factum and authorities to Aug. 14, 2000 (book form), Completed on: 2000-08-11 Ainsworth Technologies Inc.
2000-08-11 Notice of change of counsel, from Genest, Murray to Heenan, Blaikie Ainsworth Technologies Inc.
2000-06-15 Decision on motion to extend time, Reg, to serve & file the respondents' factum to July 4, 2000.
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-06-15 Submission of motion to extend time, Reg
2000-06-15 Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 2000-10-02
2000-06-12 Response to motion to extend time, from Lang Michener dated June 8/00 - included at Tab 3 of Motion Record, Completed on: 2000-06-12 Mary Danyluk
2000-06-12 Motion to extend time, to serve and file the Factum, Record and Authorities to July 4/00 (book form), Completed on: 2000-06-12 Ainsworth Technologies Inc.
2000-04-26 Order on motion to extend time
2000-04-20 Appellant's book of authorities, (see order) (vol. 1 and 2), Completed on: 2000-04-20 Mary Danyluk
2000-04-20 Appellant's factum, (see order), Completed on: 2000-04-20 Mary Danyluk
2000-04-20 Appellant's record, (see order), Completed on: 2000-04-20 Mary Danyluk
2000-04-17 Decision on motion to extend time, DeRg, to serve & file the appellant's factum, record and book of authorities to April 20, 2000.
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-04-17 Submission of motion to extend time, DeRg
2000-04-07 Motion to extend time, (to file the factum, record and authorities to April 20, 2000 (book form), Completed on: 2000-04-07 Mary Danyluk
2000-02-03 Appeal court record, (1 small box)
1999-12-09 Letter acknowledging receipt of notice of appeal
1999-12-02 Notice of deposit for security Mary Danyluk
1999-12-02 Notice of appeal, Completed on: 1999-12-02 Mary Danyluk
1999-11-05 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties
1999-11-04 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal is granted with costs.
Granted, with costs
1999-11-03 Correspondence received from, E. Meehan dated Nov. 3, 1999 re: enclosing a decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Perez v. GE Capital Technology Management Services Canada Inc. Mary Danyluk
1999-09-27 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Ma Bi Arb
1999-06-23 Correspondence received from, A. Tremayne, Ottawa agent for the respondents, dated June 22, 1999 re: responding to Lang, Michener's letter dated June 7, 1999 Ainsworth Technologies Inc.
1999-06-08 Correspondence received from, Lang, Michener dated June 7, 1999 re: enclosing a decision of the C.A. for Ontario (Libbey Canada Inc.) Mary Danyluk
1999-03-10 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 1999-03-10 Mary Danyluk
1999-03-08 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
1999-03-03 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 1999-03-03 Ainsworth Technologies Inc.
1999-02-01 Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 1999-02-01 Mary Danyluk
 

loading