Summary
40631
Corinne Marie Pereira v. Attorney General of British Columbia
(British Columbia) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Keywords
Criminal law — Private prosecutions — Process hearings — Pre-enquête hearings — Evidence — Fresh evidence — Whether Crown may direct stay of proceedings before hearing occurs —Whether Court of Appeal erred in declining to admit fresh evidence on appeal — Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, ss. 507.1, 579
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The applicant swore four private informations against various individuals. The informations were placed on a provincial court docket for a hearing under s. 507.1 of the Criminal Code. The Crown stayed all four informations the day before the process hearing. The applicant sought certiorari of the Crown’s decision to stay the proceedings.
The chambers judge held that there is no absolute right to a hearing under s. 507.1. The Crown’s discretion to direct a stay of proceedings is only reviewable where evidence of flagrant impropriety demonstrates an abuse of process. There was no such evidence here. The application was dismissed.
The Court of Appeal found no error in the chambers judge’s decision. It also dismissed a fresh evidence application on the basis that the proposed evidence was not relevant to a decisive issue in the proceeding.
Lower Court Rulings
Supreme Court of British Columbia
2022 BCSC 1619, 35828; 35829; 35830; 35831
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)
2023 BCCA 31, CA48503
- Date modified: