Summary

38785

Ryan Curtis Reilly v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Alta.) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Keywords

Canadian charter (Criminal) - Right to life, liberty and security of person (s. 7), Arbitrary detention (s. 9), Right to bail (s. 11(e)), Remedy - Charter of Rights - Right to life, liberty and security of person - Arbitrary detention - Right to bail - Remedy - Appellant held for longer than 24 hours before he was taken before a Justice of the Peace contrary to s. 503(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, and a breach of his ss. 7, 9 and 11(e) Charter rights - Whether a stay of proceedings was the appropriate remedy for Charter breach - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in failing to adhere to its jurisdiction in a Crown appeal of the appellant’s stay of his criminal charges - Whether the Court of Appeal erred by misapplying the test in R v. Babos, 2014 SCC 16, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 309 by imposing a nonexistent obligation on the accused to establish a “systemic remedy” to go together with a stay of proceedings - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in applying the appropriate standard of review - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in overturning the trial judge’s remedy of a stay of proceedings - ss. 7, 9, 11(e), 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The appellant was arrested on April 4, 2017 at 11:50 a.m. He was not brought before a justice for his bail hearing until April 5, 2017 at 10:59 p.m. The continuing detention of the appellant pending a bail hearing was governed by s. 503(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 which requires a detained person to be taken before a justice within a period of 24 hours and “without unreasonable delay” when a justice is available and brought “as soon as possible” when a justice is not available. The Crown conceded that the appellant had been held for longer than 24 hours before he was taken before a justice contrary to s. 503(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, and that this was a breach of his ss. 7, 9 and 11(e) Charter rights. The provincial court judge issued a stay of proceedings. The Court of Appeal set aside the stay of proceedings and ordered the applicant to stand trial.